Vitalik Buterin: Pro-Crypto Candidates Are Not Enough for the Industry’s Future

Vitalik Buterin: Pro-Crypto Candidates Are Not Enough for the Industry’s Future

full version at beincrypto

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, has voiced concerns over the crypto community’s political strategies. He argues that supporting political candidates solely based on their pro-crypto stance is insufficient.

Instead, he advocates for a broader evaluation that considers alignment with the fundamental values of decentralization, privacy, and technological freedom.

Buterin Urges Crypto Community to Broaden Political Criteria

In his detailed blog post, Buterin examines the growing trend of supporting political candidates based solely on their pro-crypto stance.

“I argue against this trend, and in particular, I argue that making decisions in this way carries a high risk of going against the values that brought you into the crypto space in the first place,” he stated.

Read more: Who Is Vitalik Buterin? An In-Depth Look at Ethereum’s Co-Founder

Buterin highlights the crypto movement’s origins in the cypherpunk ethos, focusing on technological freedom, privacy, and the battle against restrictive copyright laws. He also points out how early advocates promoted decentralization to safeguard individual liberties beyond financial transactions. He argues that the community should align itself with political figures supporting these values in all areas, not just cryptocurrency.

Furthermore, Buterin warns that supporting politicians solely based on their pro-crypto stance can be dangerous. He points out that such candidates may not necessarily share the crypto community’s broader ideological commitments, leading to potential conflicts.

“If you see a politician being crypto-friendly, one thing you can do is look up their views on crypto itself five years ago. Similarly, look up their views on related topics, such as encrypted messaging five years ago. Particularly, try to find a topic where ‘supporting freedom’ is unaligned with ‘supporting corporations’; the copyright wars of the 2000s are a good example of this. This can be a good guide on what kinds of changes to their views might happen five years in the future,” he explained.

Buterin uses Russia’s example to illustrate how pro-crypto policies can be selectively applied to benefit the government while restricting individual freedoms. Thus, he urges the community to remain vigilant and avoid aligning with politicians who might use crypto support to further authoritarian agendas.

Crypto and Politics: Leaders Discuss Idealism vs. Pragmatism

This post has sparked a lively debate within the crypto community. Ki Young Ju, CEO of the on-chain analytic platform CryptoQuant, questioned the practicality of Buterin’s approach. Ju argues that the political reality often necessitates supporting pro-crypto candidates.

“1. Politicians are unlikely to grasp the cypherpunk spirit. 2. The future of crypto will be shaped by supply and demand within capitalism under uninformed politicians and voters. Given this, isn’t it wiser to vote for crypto-friendly politicians? What other options are there?” Ju wrote.

Jake Chervinsky, Chief Legal Officer at Variant Fund, echoed some of Buterin’s concerns. However, he emphasized the importance of electing pro-crypto candidates to ensure favorable policy outcomes. He also suggested that while idealism is important, political pragmatism is necessary to achieve tangible results.

Meanwhile, Nic Carter, general partner at Castle Island Venture, expressed his comfort with aligning crypto with libertarian and conservative values. He believes these are consistent with the principles of decentralization and individual freedom.

“It’s not a coincidence that the Republicans have embraced it. Their disclosed crypto platform is entirely consistent with those values. I am totally comfortable aligning bitcoin, crypto, core American values, and the contemporary Republican Party, I see no contradiction or dissonance whatsoever,” Carter opined.

Read more: Crypto Regulation: What Are the Benefits and Drawbacks?

Buterin’s opinion is particularly noteworthy, given that most of the industry leaders have voiced their support for pro-crypto candidates. For instance, earlier in May, Charles Hoskinson, another Ethereum co-founder and founder of Cardano (ADA), publicly urged the community to vote for crypto in the upcoming November election.

The influence of crypto in the upcoming US presidential election has become more apparent, as evidenced by the substantial contributions to pro-crypto political efforts. BeInCrypto reported that several key industry figures, including Gemini’s Winklevoss twins, Ripple, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), and Jump Crypto, have made millions of dollars in donations to Fairshake—a super political action committee (PAC) supporting pro-crypto politicians.

Recent conversions

20 XYO to USD 75 BTC to EUR 0.00000100 BTC to CHF 76 ETH to USD 0.0048 BTC to NOK 188 ETH to AUD 1 BTC to ETB 02 BTC to CHF 1 BTC to UAH 0.17 ETH to GBP 0.22 BTC to NOK