Federal Reserve’s CBDC Plans Thwarted by U.S. House Vote – What’s Next for Digital Currency?
In a significant move, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to prevent the Federal Reserve from issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) directly to American citizens. This decision was reflected in the passing of the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, which saw 213 Republicans and 3 Democrats vote in favor, culminating in a 262 to 192 victory for the bill’s proponents.
This legislation, introduced by Representative Tom Emmer (R-MN), a known pro-crypto advocate, is the third piece of crypto-focused legislation approved by Congress this month.
The crypto community, particularly online advocates of decentralized, trustless currencies like Bitcoin, has largely celebrated this legislative development. Rep. Emmer emphasized that this bill is designed to ensure that digital currency policies in the United States reflect core values such as privacy, individual sovereignty, and free market competitiveness.
He stated that this move keeps the development of digital currencies under the control of the American people, aligning with these foundational values.
The Debate Over CBDCs and Financial Privacy
The nature of CBDCs, which are issued and controlled by central banks, stands in contrast to decentralized currencies like Bitcoin. CBDCs are typically backed by or act as substitutes for a country’s fiat currency.
In some jurisdictions, such as in the case of China’s digital yuan, CBDCs are used to monitor consumer purchases and contribute to assessments of social credit scores. This potential for surveillance and control has raised significant concerns among U.S. lawmakers.
Representative French Hill (R-AR) supported the bill, citing the potential dangers of such powers when wielded by the state. He referenced an incident where Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau froze the bank accounts of citizens who donated to anti-vaccine mandate protests in 2022, highlighting the risks of centralized control over citizens’ finances. Rep.
Hill advocated for the use of private sector innovations such as payment stablecoins over a retail central bank digital currency, citing the efficiency and innovation of the private sector in managing payments.
Conversely, some Democrats, including Financial Services Committee ranking member Maxine Waters (D-CA), argued that the United States could lead in demonstrating how to issue a privacy-respecting CBDC. She countered that the bill could stifle U.S. innovation and global competitiveness and potentially weaken the Federal agency most critical to fighting inflation.
Waters argued for a balanced approach that would allow the U.S. to guide the development of CBDCs without letting foreign digital currencies like the digital yuan dominate.
Legislative Context and Broader Implications
This legislative action comes on the heels of the House’s passage of the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21) on Wednesday. FIT21, which received substantial bipartisan support with 71 Democrats voting in favor, establishes clear guidelines for how cryptocurrencies and crypto companies should register with federal market regulators.
Unlike the divisive CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, FIT21 represents a more unified approach to managing the burgeoning crypto sector.
This series of legislative actions underscores a complex landscape where lawmakers are attempting to balance innovation in the crypto sector with the need to protect consumer privacy and national economic security.
As the U.S. navigates these waters, the outcome of these legislative efforts will likely have long-lasting impacts on how digital currencies are developed, regulated, and integrated into the broader financial system in the country and potentially influence global standards in the digital economy.
